• ChesReport (current)
  • Marine Invasions Lab
  • Partner Portals
    Nemesis California Panama Galapagos Cocos Island NP JTMD
    Archived Projects
    Chesapeake
  • Browse Species
    Taxonomic Groups All Species
  • News
  • login
You are viewing an archived site. The Chesapeake Bay Introduced Species Database project ended in 2020 and the database is no longer receiving updates. Learn more…
Image of Esox masquinongy

Esox masquinongy

Fishes

Muskellunge

Muskellunge, "muskie" for short, is a long and thin fish that looks like a Northern Pike (Esox lucius). They are native to the St. Lawrence River, Great Lakes, Hudson Bay (Red River) and the Mississippi River basin. As a sport fish they were frequently introduced and have established populations in 31 states. Stocking in the Chesapeake Watershed began in the 1950s. Most were introduced the reservoirs but juveniles have been seen in the upper James River in Virginia and the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania. So far Muskellunge haven’t invaded beyond these rivers and the reservoirs around the Coastal Plain where they’ve been stocked. Reproduction within these populations is rare and is dependent on stocking. Stocking has ended in Pennsylvania but continues in Virginia. Significant impacts on native fishes haven’t been reported.

Image Credit: Courtesy of iCom, artist unknown

Description Taxonomy Invasion History Ecology Impacts References

Description

Common Names- The name 'Tiger Muskie' is sometimes used for a color variant of Esox masquinongy, but usually refers to the hybrid Esox lucius X Esox masquinongy (Scott and Crossman 1973).

Potentially Misidentified Species- Esox lucius X Esox masquinongy is a sterile artificial hybrid. E. reicherti (Amur Pike) is native to Asia (Russia, China) and was introduced to Glendale Lake (PA) in the Susquehanna drainage. It has not been reported from the river proper (Denoncourt et al. 1975b), and is considered a failed introduction (Courtenay et al. 1984).


Taxonomy

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Animalia Chordata Osteichthyes Salmoniformes Esocidae Esox

Synonyms

Esox estor; Esox nobilior; Esox nobilis; Lucius masquinongy; Esox immaculatus; Esox amentus

Invasion History

Chesapeake Bay Status

First Record Population Range Introduction Residency Source Region Native Region Vectors
1973 Established Stable Introduced Boundary Resident North America North America Fisheries(Fisheries Intentional)

History of Spread

Esox masquinongy's (Muskellunge) native range was 'originally St. Lawrence-Great Lakes, Hudson Bay (Red River) and Mississippi River basins from Quebec to southeast Manitoba, south in the Appalachians to GA, and in the west to IA' (Page and Burr 1991). It is probably introduced in VA's Ohio drainages and elsewhere in VA (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Esox masquinongy are frequently introduced in Atlantic drainages, and south and west of their native range, but seldom successfully. Altogether, they have been introduced to 28 states (Fuller et al. 1999; Page and Burr 1991; Scott and Crossman 1973).

Widespread stocking in the Chesapeake Basin apparently began in 1960's in PA (Fowler 1948) and later in MD and VA. Most stocked fish came from the OH drainage (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). In VA and most of MD this species appears to be largely or wholly confined to reservoirs (Lee et al. 1981; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Esox masquinongy in our area appear to be largely dependent on stocking, but small juveniles have been seen in the upper James VA (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993) and Susquehanna Rivers PA (Mangan 1986). Riverine populations occur in the Susquehanna (Bielo 1963; Denoncourt and Cooper 1975; Mangan 1986; McKeown 1984) and in the Delaware Estuary (Horowitz 1986; Raasch and Altemus 1991).

James River- Esox masquinongy have been caught in Richmond, at the head of tidal waters (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993).

Potomac River - Esox masquinongy are stocked in Piedmont streams and impoundments; some still survive in Burke Lake, Fairfax County VA (Ernst et al. 1995). Muskellunge have been caught just above the tidal region as recently as 2009 (Starnes et al. 2011).

Susquehanna River - Attempts by the PA Fish Commission at extending the range of Esox masquinongy in PA began in 1953, and introductions to the Susquehanna started in the 1960's (Mangan 1986). Bielo's (1963) survey found E. masquinongy's only in the Northern PA sections of the river, but it was recorded in Susquehanna and Conowingo Reservoir (1973-75) (Denoncourt and Cooper 1975), and found below Conowingo Dam in 1972-84 (McKeown 1984). A few juveniles have been found in the Susquehanna (Mangan 1986). PA has stopped stocking of esocids in the Susquehanna (McLean 1999, personal communication).

Delaware River- Esox masquinongy were introduced in Wayne County PA by 1919 (Fowler 1919; 1948). They were stocked in Brandywine Creek PA in 1964-65 and caught in DE by 1967-68. Muskellunge are dependent on stocking in Delaware Estuary. The 'Tiger Musky' Esox lucius X Esox masquinongy was stocked in larger numbers (Horwitz 1986; Raasch and Altemus 1991). Stocking of Esox masquinongy has been stopped in the Delaware River (Raasch 1997).

History References - Bielo 1963; Denoncourt and Cooper 1975; Denoncourt et al. 1975b; Ernst et al. 1995; Fowler 1919; Fowler 1948; Fuller et al. 1999; Horwitz 1986; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1981; Mangan 1986; McLean 1999 personal communication; ; McKeown 1984; Raasch 1996; Raasch and Altemus 1991; Scott and Crossman 1973

Invasion Comments

Ecology

Environmental Tolerances

For SurvivalFor Reproduction
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Temperature (ºC) 0.0 32.0 9.4 14.0
Salinity (‰) 0.0 0.0
Oxygen
pH
Salinity Range fresh-oligo

Age and Growth

Male Female
Minimum Adult Size (mm)
Typical Adult Size (mm)
Maximum Adult Size (mm)
Maximum Longevity (yrs)
Typical Longevity (yrs

Reproduction

Start Peak End
Reproductive Season
Typical Number of Young
Per Reproductive Event
Sexuality Mode(s)
Mode(s) of Asexual
Reproduction
Fertilization Type(s)
More than One Reproduction
Event per Year
Reproductive Startegy
Egg/Seed Form

Impacts

Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay

Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) may be (or have been) an important gamefish in the nontidal Susquehanna, and reservoirs in the watershed, if abundance permits (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1981; Raasch and Altemus 1991). The discontinuation of stocking in the Susquehanna means that abundance of this species is likely to decline in this river. However, stocking continues in Virginia drainages. This fish probably has few or no economic impacts on native biota in the Chesapeake Bay proper.

References- Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Lee et al. 1981; Raasch and Altemus 1991


Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay

Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) is one of North America's premier sportfish, prized both for large size and agressiveness (Scott and Crossman 1973). It has been introduced to watersheds in 39 states, and has become established in some of those (Fuller et al. 1999). Esox masquinongy were stocked in PA waters of the Delaware River estuary from the 1960s to the early 1990s, but are declining with the cessation of releases (Raasch 1997).

References- Fuller et al. 1999; Raasch 1997; Scott and Crossman 1973


Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species

Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) appears to be confined to the Susquehanna and James Rivers (McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991) and reservoirs around the Coastal Plain (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Since reproduction is rare in the Susquehanna and elsewhere in the Chesapeake region (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986), this species is dependent on stocking. Stocking has ceased in PA, but continues in VA (Christmas et al. 2000). Significant impacts on native fishes are unlikely in tidal waters.

References - Christmas et al. 2000; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986; McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991


Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species

Esox masquinongy (Muskellunge) appears to be confined to the Susquehanna and James Rivers (McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991) and reservoirs around the Coastal Plain (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993). Since reproduction is rare in the Susquehanna and elsewhere in the Chesapeake region (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986), this species is dependent on stocking. Stocking has ceased in PA, but continues in VA (Christmas et al. 2000). Significant impacts on native fishes are unlikely in tidal waters.

References - Christmas et al. 2000; Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Mangan 1986; McKeown 1984; Pavol and Davis 1982; Raasch and Altemus 1991


References

Becker, George C. (1983) Fishes of Wisconsin, , Madison. Pp.

Bielo, Robert J. (1963) A fishery investigation of the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania, In: (Eds.) . , Newark. Pp.

Carlander, Kenneth D. (1969) Handbook of freshwater fishery biology. Vol. 1., In: (Eds.) . , Ames. Pp.

Christmas, John and 7 authors. (1998) History, management, and status of introduced fishes in the Chesapeake Bay basin., In: Therres, Glenn D.(Eds.) Conservation of Biological Diversity: A Key to Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and Beyond.. , Annapolis. Pp. 97-116

Courtenay, Walter R., Jr.; Hensley, Dannie A.; Taylor, Jeffrey; McCann, James A. (1984) Distribution of exotic fishes in the continental United States., In: Courtenay, Walter R., and Stauffer, Jay R.(Eds.) Distribution, Biology, and Management of Exotic Fishes. , Baltimore, MD. Pp.

Denoncourt, Robert F.; Robbins, Timothy W.; Hesser, Robert (1975) Recent introductions and reintroductions to the Pennsylvania fish fauna of the Susquehanna River drainage above Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 49: 57-58

Denoncourt, Robert F.; Cooper, Edwin L. (1975) A review of the literature and checklist of fishes of the Susquehanna River drainage above Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 49: 121-125

Ernst, Carl H.; Wilgenbusch, James C.,; Morgan, Donald L.; Boucher, Timothy P.; Sommerfield, Mark (1995) Fishes of Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Maryland Naturalist 39: 1-60

Fowler, Henry W. (1919) A list of the fishes of Pennsylvania, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 32: 49-74

Fowler, Henry W. (1948) A list of the fishes of Pennsylvania., Bulletin of the Board of Fish Commisioners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 7: 1-26

Fuller, Pam. L.; Nico, Leo; Williams, J. D. (1999) Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States, , Bethesda MD. Pp.

Horwitz, Richard J. (1986) Fishes of the Delaware estuary in Pennsylvania., In: Majundar, S.K., Brenner, F. J., Rhoads, A. F.(Eds.) Endangered and Threatened Species Programs in Pennsylvania.. , Philadelphia. Pp. 177-201

Jenkins, Robert E.; Burkhead, Noel M. (1993) Freshwater fishes of Virginia., , Bethesda, MD. Pp.

Lee, David S.; Platania, S. P.; Gilbert, Carter R.; Franz, Richard; Norden, Arnold (1981) A revised list of the freshwater fishes of Maryland and Delaware, Proceedings of the Southeastern Fishes Council 3: 1-9

Mangan, Brian P. (1986) Natural reproduction of the muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) in the Susquehanna River, near Berwick, Pennsylvania, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 60: 200

McKeown, Paul E. (1984) Additions to ichthyofauna of the Susquehanna River with a checklist of fishes of the Susquehanna River drainage below Conowingo Dam, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 58: 187-192

Page, Lawrence M.; Burr, Brooks M. (1991) Freshwater Fishes., , Boston. Pp.

Pavol, Kenneth W.; Davis, Robert W. (1982) An investigation of the smallmouth bass in the Susquehanna River below Conowingo Dam, F-29R , Annapolis MD. Pp.

Raasch, Maynard S. (1996) Delaware's Freshwater and Brackish Water Fishes: A Popular Account., , Neptune, NJ. Pp.

Raasch, Maynard S.; Altemus, Vaughn L., Sr. (1991) Delaware's freshwater and brackish water fishes: a popular account, , Wilmingotn, Delaware. Pp.

Scott, W. B.; Crossman, E. J. (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada, , Ottawa. Pp.

Starnes, Wayne C. (2002) Current diversity, historical analysis, and biotic integrity of fishes in the lower Potomac basin in the vicinity of Plummers Island, MD, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115: 273-320


Direct questions and comments to chesnemo@si.edu.

©